Authoritarianism research has evolved into one of the fastest growing research fields in comparative politics. The newly awakened interest in autocratic regimes goes hand in hand with a lack of systematic research on the results of the political and substantive policy performance of variants of autocratic regimes. The contributions in this second volume of Comparing
Full Download Comparing autocracies in the early Twenty-first Century: Vol 2: The Performance and Persistence of Autocracies (Democratization Special Issues) - Aurel Croissant file in PDF
Related searches:
How Do Inclusionary and Exclusionary Autocracies Affect - EconStor
Comparing autocracies in the early Twenty-first Century: Vol 2: The Performance and Persistence of Autocracies (Democratization Special Issues)
Civil Society Capture by Early Stage Autocrats in Well-Developed
Non-tyrannical Autocracies - UCLA Social Sciences
Nationalism and legitimation for authoritarianism: A comparison of
Democracy? Autocracy? Coronavirus Doesn't Care. – The Diplomat
Awards Archive – Democracy and Autocracy - APSA Connect
In an autocracy are more critical with democracy compared with citizens who were period in early adulthood, these attitudes and preferences remain relatively.
First, there is a dictator, that is, an unelected executive with legislative powers. Let us clarify this definition by comparing electoral autocracies with other non-.
The comparative democratization section made the first of what would become annual awards for the best book and best article published in the preceding year.
May 8, 2014 in an autocracy, political preferences cannot be expressed and citizens the countries that democratized first were also mostly the countries that first it allows us to compare political regimes across time and spac.
Under nicholas, this was exemplified in the tripartite (orthodoxy, autocracy, and the net result, in gerschenkron's analysis of late 19th–early 20th century.
Post Your Comments: